воскресенье, 22 мая 2011 г.

jeff dunham peanut part 1

jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%


  • iJohnHenry
    Feb 1, 09:07 AM
    I was just curious, because it seems as if it is a "different" person posting. Perhaps in a day or two we'll see you posting how your little sister or mom got hold of your MacRumors account and posted all kind of weird stuff.




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%


  • kirk26
    Apr 14, 03:02 PM
    Things seem to be smoother with my VZ iPhone 4 opening and closing programs. I always though my iPTouch 4G was snappier than my VZ iPhone but I think they are on par with each other now. This probably has nothing to do with it, but I just did a speedtest and I have yet to ever hit those numbers until now. I was averaging anywhere from 650-1200kbps and sometimes 1500kbps on rare occasions.

    (Picture will resize if it is huge. I apologize. It just takes a little bit of time for Photobucket to catch up.)
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/crazyjeeper/Link%20Stuff/photo.png

    Don't believe it! Everyone here thinks it's lies! :rolleyes: :D




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%


  • drummerdude1390
    Apr 22, 05:53 PM
    1) Lose job at Engadget

    2) Start new website

    3) Publish iphone "rumor" to attract readership

    4) Profit!

    do you know how dumb that is? He's moving on to a new company. Along with multiple other people. Also, he was dead on about the Verizon iPhone a YEAR before everyone else. I think his inside sources are more accurate than you think.

    Also, remember when everyone thought the leaked iPhone 4 was really ugly and there was no way it was real. Exactly...




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%


  • LarryC
    Apr 25, 04:23 PM
    Think iPad 2 with the "L" shape stand as the new iMac. Ditch the Optical Drive, not needed anymore considering its takes up space and is hardly ever used by the majority. :)

    I may not be in the majority, but I use mine a great deal.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%


  • Socratic
    May 1, 09:34 PM
    Proof please. You have no idea what does or doesn't go to the artists, songwriters, producers, etc. You are speculating. The site has been up and running for years now, because noone has been able to prove in a court that they are doing anything illegal. If the courts decide otherwise and shut the site down, I'll move back to Amazon.

    You have implied your own proof. The fact that they are in Court at all should tell you money is not going from the site to the record labels / artists etc.

    The only reason the cases have failed is that its not illegal under Russian law. Russian sites are violating international law in making this content available, but international law is very, very difficult to enforce. Especially where the action is legal in the violating nation.




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%


  • Abstract
    Oct 21, 07:47 AM
    I kind of have everything I want, so I guess I want me and my girlfriend to be happy for another year?

    Forget that.

    I want backyard lawn furniture for the coming summer months, and a Dell Streak once it gets a newer version of Android. :D

    I'll probably get the lawn furniture, but I definitely won't get a Dell Streak with 1 year left on a 2 year iPhone contract.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%


  • Carlson-online
    Apr 28, 04:11 PM
    iphone 4 white is so yesterdays news . i want to know when the humancentipad is coming out!!!!!




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%


  • tigres
    Apr 14, 12:31 PM
    Just let us know if Safari --> Youtube links are fixed.

    tired of the force quit after the white pages.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%


  • einmusiker
    Dec 31, 12:25 AM
    No, I'm 100% right. Weight control is about calories. End of story. Calories in < Calories out and you lose weight. Opposite and you gain weight. There's no more or less here, that is the very basic premise. You want to discuss specifics that affect calories in/calories out, but that's flawed. Teach people the base first, and let them balance themselves out. You can very easily test your metabolic rate.



    So you're saying these people have abnormally low "Calories out". It still comes down to that very simple equation. These people first have to fix their calories out, get their metabolism back straight, then they can fix their calories in.

    It is that easy to lose weight. People don't know this very simple and basic concept, they think "Fat/Sugar" has to do with weight, which is completely false. "Low Saturated Fat!" on a box of cookies means squat if the cookies are 170 calories for 3 vs 180 calories for 3 of the same cookies with normal saturated fat. You still can't eat the whole box in one sitting and think "hey, it's low fat, I can't gain weight from this".

    You'd be surprised how many people think this way.



    People struggle because like someone pointed out, they lack willpower and I'll add that they lack education. Calorie control is the only way to lose weight. There's seriously no other way, since weight is based off of calories and calories alone. To lose weight, you need a calorie deficiency. To be more precise, 3500 calories = 1 lbs, each way. So you need to create a calorie deficiency of 3500 calories before you lose 1 lbs. My metabolic rate is around 1740, that's what I burn each day without lifting a finger. Add in my normal routine, and I'm around the magic 2000 calorie diet. Let's not add in my gym routine. So to lose 1 lbs in 7 days, I need to go on a 1500 calorie diet per day. That's going to give me a deficiency of 500 per day, times 7 days, 1 lbs lost.

    There's entire industries because they profit from it. Some people like to buy "instant" solutions. 1 lbs in 7 days ? Bah humbug, too long, I have 100 to lose! There's no instant solutions to weight loss, quite the contrary, the entire weight loss industry makes money by keeping people fat and coming back for miracle cures. Their proposed plans of "1 shake/bar for breakfeast, same for lunch and a balanced diner" is awful. First, it should be the opposite, a good breakfeast and then their bars/shakes for lunch and diner. Breakfeast is where you get your day's energy. Second, that's not calorie control since it doesn't explain that it is trying to create a calorie deficit. So people just still overeat, they compensate the calories they didn't eat at breakfeast/lunch with a huge "balanced" diner.



    I'm 32, work 35 hours per week in IT (sitting down on my ass), am on call with tons of pages coming in once every 2 weeks. I have a girlfriend, a mortgage and a dog.

    Again, staying trim has nothing to do with having time or being busy or not. If you spend less calories, eat less calories. Balance your calories in to your calories out and you'll stay trim. Sure it means doing a bit more research into what you're eating, but that's not impossible. It also means listening to your body. Feeling "stuffed" means you overate. You should never feel full or stuffed. A donut is not faster to mow down than an Apple. It's not more filling either. It's tons more calories though.

    You made an assumption about me and you were wrong. You should look at yourself and what you are or aren't doing that is making you fat, not make up excuses.



    But again, it's just because you don't understand your caloric need for a day and you either overeat or eat just the right amount to maintain your weight. You don't even need to exercise to create a calorie deficiency. I think you're the perfect example of what I'm talking about, you don't understand the very basic concept, which has nothing to do with time spent, but rather food ingested.

    People need to get it out of their heads that it is about exercise. It's 10% working out, 90% food. Get your nutrition right and you won't need to exercise a day in your life. If you want to get fit however, make sure to balance your nutrition around your added caloric need to not drop weight too fast or at all if your goal is maintaining.
    ok, I'm sorry but how the hell do you know what I do or don't understand about nutrition?? your presumptions are offensive




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%


  • smiddlehurst
    May 3, 08:37 AM
    And yet prices in the Australian Apple Store are still 25% higher than the USA Store. How rude, Apple.

    Top end 27" iMac = US$1999, or in the Australian Store, AUD$2299 which at the current exchange rate is about US$2500. Why should we pay more, Apple? If anything, we're closer to China so should pay less on shipping!

    Whilst it's slightly better than yesterdays prices, I'm still seriously not happy.
    I'd buy one if we got the USA prices.

    *sigh* Every time someone makes this mistake...

    Bear in mind that the US prices do not include sales tax of any kind. In your case Australian prices include GST which I believe currently runs at 10%? If you're anything like the UK there may be additional import taxes to pay and the cost of doing business is likely to be higher (everything from shipping costs to salaries affect the price you pay at the checkout). Add in a margain that Apple will calculate to protect themselves from changes in the exchange rate and you'll probably be very close to price parity. Just as in the UK you're paying extra for the product because of the country, not because of Apple.

    That's not to say Apple DON'T screw up on exchange rates and gouge the heck out of us non-Americans of course. The Mac Mini being the most recent, and painful, example. But you need to make sure you compare like for like before complaining.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%


  • AppleScruff1
    Apr 23, 12:01 PM
    So many people just love to see every issue from the Apple perspective. There are people who get paid for that. Should not you - as a consumer - care more about the gadget you want than Apple success?



    But you're dealing with Apple customers, they sacrifice themselves for the good of the company.




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%


  • LT1FirebirdSLP
    May 4, 06:31 AM
    Never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever.........

    ...take anything an AT&T rep says at face value. This is coming from a type of representative, where in my battles earlier this year with AT&T attempting to get back to unlimited data, who told me there was nothing they could do but gave me advice on how to seamlessly switch to Verizon (including how to port my phone number and suggested I keep my AT&T account open until I switch to VZ).

    While I fully believe this story did actually take place, I believe the rep has 'ZERO' credibility.

    FYI: My later wrangling with corporate was a lot more pleasant and yielded me my Unlimited iPhone data plan back.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%


  • Tower-Union
    Sep 18, 01:31 PM
    I used to fold with Macrumors a few years ago, as I remember it we had a pretty powerful team, seems now things are waning, and this board has cooled off. I suppose I'm guilty of leaving as well (jumped ship for Penny Arcade, great comic BTW), am I just glossing over old memories or have things actually slowed down?




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%


  • troup
    Jul 24, 05:35 PM
    Would be nice if apple allowed you to charge the mouse via USB like the RadTech BT600 http://www.radtech.us/Products/BT600.aspx.

    I got one of these to replace my MightyMouse and single button apple bluetooth mouse. Been using it with my macbook and its fantastic.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%


  • Popeye206
    Apr 14, 05:13 AM
    Will iX come in white?




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%


  • Sambo110
    Apr 15, 08:03 PM
    Only updated my iPad to 4.3, was too lazy to update my iPod Touch, but with all these battery drain issues I might hold off, 4.3 doesn't have anything I need for my iPod.



    more...

    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%


  • logandzwon
    Apr 22, 09:09 AM
    yeah, apple are stupid....they havnt got a clue what they are doing have they... :rolleyes:

    No clue at all. Have you seen that apple phone? It is the most expensive phone in the world and it doesn't appeal to business customers!




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%


  • iSee
    Apr 16, 06:27 PM
    Why would you need 64 bit for a MBA? To fly off those huge sample libraries that the processor would lock up over?
    64 bit is only for massive memory allocations and a MBA doesn't even have the CPU to pull it off... :rolleyes:

    At this point I think it's mainly a matter of keeping the platform unified. Why support two kernals longer than you have to? The sooner Apple makes 64-bit the default, the sooner they can dump the 32-bit kernal altogether.




    jeff dunham peanut part 1. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%


  • zap2
    Jul 25, 11:03 AM
    What if he is?



    And most computer-users use Windows, so maybe we should all switch to Windows? Point is that there ARE lots of people who like to expand their systems. To them, iMac is completely unsuitable, and PowerMac is simply too much (too much space, too much technology, too much money, you name it). There have been LOTS of people saying that they would love to see a relatively inexpensive Mac that is expandable. iMac is not that. Neither is PowerMac.

    What happens if the screen in the iMac breaks down? The whole computer becomes useless. What if you need faster vid-card? you have to buy a new computer. All-in-one has it's benefits, but it has it's drawbacks, and there are lots of people who do not want those drawbacks. Yes, minitower (for example) has it's drawbacks as well, but there are lots of people who would be willing to accept those drawback for the benefits such a system offers.



    Well good for you. How that helps ME is beyond me.



    Are we using somekind of miniature-desks or something? I have a rather typical desk, and it currently has a Mac Mini, a TFT-screen, old, huge printer that does not work, and it still has plenty of space for mouse, keyboard and other items. And that "small metallic box" means that your iMac loses that all-in-one elegance it now has.



    Some of us would be willing to accept that. A minitower would consume about as much desk-space as two Mac Mini's. That's more than reasonable IMO.


    2 Mac Mini should still be very small.. but i would love to see a Cube sized Mac agian..maybe this time it would sell.




    maclaptop
    May 4, 12:18 AM
    OR another reason: Apple decided to go verizon exclusive and ATT is shunned.

    If I wasn't a shareholder, I'd enjoy watching what would happen if this far fetched idea occurred. I know that it would certainly prove interesting.




    Frisco
    Jul 21, 07:57 PM
    Sorry guys. I was asking how much of Apple does Bill Gates actually own via stock, not the market share that Apple has. This info is very hard to find.

    Microsoft bought 150 million in non-voting stock. Hardly a controlling interest. They have since sold most if not all of that stock for a tidy profit. Apple in turn dropped the "Look and Feel" lawsuit (which they weren't going to win anyway) and MS promised updates to "Office" and IE. Microsoft has NO significant financial stake in Apple.

    See this (http://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-18155.html)




    bigandy
    Nov 3, 10:58 AM
    Oooh that looks better than Parallels. I like the connectivity stuff above too. :)




    ChazUK
    Apr 22, 05:23 AM
    - Grid of icons: Check
    - A bottom line of icons (or dock): Check
    - One button: Check
    - Round corners on bezel: Check

    If this is inaccurate, then Apple's claim is inaccurate as well. Because, sure, there are all sorts of details that make this phone different from the iPhone.

    I'm not saying that the iPhone is ripped off from the F700. I'm saying that there are a lot of similarities, just as there are a lot of similarities pointed out in Apple's claim.

    I predict they will not stick.

    The dates are wrong as the F700 was unveiled after Apple announced the iPhone at MacWorld in 2007




    appleguy123
    May 1, 10:45 AM
    Appleguy will bring them to you when he leaves the kiddie party.
    There are no wings there, but I can bring him some Gerber.



    Комментариев нет:

    Отправить комментарий